<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung Galaxy S3 is a disappointment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.android.gs/samsung-galaxy-s3-a-disappointment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.android.gs/samsung-galaxy-s3-a-disappointment/</link>
	<description>Android News &#38; How to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:33:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NameHermit</title>
		<link>http://www.android.gs/samsung-galaxy-s3-a-disappointment/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>NameHermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 05:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.android.gs/?p=4177#comment-559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the sentiment Alex has expressed, though I would have enjoyed a bit more in-depth review. Yes, Samsung really stumbled here. There are MANY things which could have been done, both with looks and substance, to improve this phone (especially at the price point it will be selling for). They could have offered it in a half dozen different colors. The body could have been new or different material--for example what about carbon fiber or brushed aluminum, etc. And to be honest, the phone looks neither expensive nor innovative. Hardly a day goes by that someone doesn&#039;t comment admiringly on my Galaxy Note. This SIII wouldn&#039;t cause even a turn of the head by anyone. As far as the specs go, the music system could have been made the state of the art. The camera could have been improved beyond what everyone else is offering. Base unit could have been 32GB rather than 16; why be so cheap Samsung? People are anxious to have reasons to shell out US$600-700 for an amazing phone/handheld device but Samsung failed to deliver anything. Period. A loser: for dorks only.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the sentiment Alex has expressed, though I would have enjoyed a bit more in-depth review. Yes, Samsung really stumbled here. There are MANY things which could have been done, both with looks and substance, to improve this phone (especially at the price point it will be selling for). They could have offered it in a half dozen different colors. The body could have been new or different material&#8211;for example what about carbon fiber or brushed aluminum, etc. And to be honest, the phone looks neither expensive nor innovative. Hardly a day goes by that someone doesn&#8217;t comment admiringly on my Galaxy Note. This SIII wouldn&#8217;t cause even a turn of the head by anyone. As far as the specs go, the music system could have been made the state of the art. The camera could have been improved beyond what everyone else is offering. Base unit could have been 32GB rather than 16; why be so cheap Samsung? People are anxious to have reasons to shell out US$600-700 for an amazing phone/handheld device but Samsung failed to deliver anything. Period. A loser: for dorks only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using apc
Database Caching using apc
Object Caching 366/368 objects using apc

 Served from: www.android.gs @ 2013-06-19 14:00:34 by W3 Total Cache -->